900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
- Mcdroid
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Gone Kwackers
- Posts: 6780
- Thanks: 418
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 12:43
Vorbeck wrote:
I'm waiting for the replies this will generate :laugh: :laugh:
Ok went to get some parts and asked about the bikes in question. The 750 is a GPZ with an 810 kit. Ported heads, crane cams, dyna plate, header and 34 cv carbs. The guy lives above cleveland tennessee so goes to dragons tail in North Carolina about once a month to play. The 1000 has a set of denco pistons and is about 1175cc. Worked head, header, denco cams, air shifter, longer swing arm, drag bars. It was fuel injected at one point but has carbs now. They both still say that the plain bearing engines are cheaper to build and stronger than the roller bearing engines. Both say you NEED to weld the crank to safely increase the performance of all the roller motor engines and that is just wasted money on a street(track day every 3months) engine when you can spend the money on a plain bearing engine and make more power in a streetable package. Also the transmissions on the 900/1000s had transmission problems like 2nd gear, that the 650/750s did not.
I dont think you can really spin the plain valve engines any higher to make up for the smaller displacement. I think the engines will run into valve train characteristic speed limitations before piston speed.
The point they were getting at was not to cafe the 1000J I have in pieces, instead build the 650 with the 750 block I got from them and but an 810 kit in it. The bike will be much faster around the track than a 1000 on a dollar per dollar bases. Also it will be less likely to break.
I'm waiting for the replies this will generate :laugh: :laugh:
Michael
Victoria, Texas
1982 GPz750
1977 KZ1000A
1978 KZ1000A
1982 GPz1100
1975 Z2A
Victoria, Texas
1982 GPz750
1977 KZ1000A
1978 KZ1000A
1982 GPz1100
1975 Z2A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- T_Dub
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 1445
- Thanks: 25
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 12:52
It'll probably be faster around a road track, no doubt, as it'll be lighter. But as for power, why would it cost more to do the same things to a 1000? You have to do all the same mods, crank welding is the only difference.
1977 KZ650B1
-810cc
-Cavanaugh Racing Head
-Mikuni RS34's
-GPR Muffler
-810cc
-Cavanaugh Racing Head
-Mikuni RS34's
-GPR Muffler
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hocbj23
-
- User
-
Public
- Thanks: 0
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:23
Where abouts in Cleveland is this bike shop? I live in Chattanooga, and I would like to roll my KZ1000 up there one day and see what these trick 650s and 750s are all about.Plus I need a good mechanic anyway to help me on some special projects I got in mind.Thanks.bj
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Vorbeck
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
-
Registered
- fubar
- Posts: 64
- Thanks: 2
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:25
Oh and both bikes on street tires not slicks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PLUMMEN
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 7986
- Thanks: 104
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:33
Vorbeck wrote:
i think Lorcan summed up how to get reliable hp from a 650/750 build when he said to buy a gpz750 turbo! :laugh:
yeah its a major pain in the ass splitting the cases on a 900/1000 to deal with the primary chain stretching,oh wait a sec thats the 650/750 problem! :woohoo:Ok went to get some parts and asked about the bikes in question. The 750 is a GPZ with an 810 kit. Ported heads, crane cams, dyna plate, header and 34 cv carbs. The guy lives above cleveland tennessee so goes to dragons tail in North Carolina about once a month to play. The 1000 has a set of denco pistons and is about 1175cc. Worked head, header, denco cams, air shifter, longer swing arm, drag bars. It was fuel injected at one point but has carbs now. They both still say that the plain bearing engines are cheaper to build and stronger than the roller bearing engines. Both say you NEED to weld the crank to safely increase the performance of all the roller motor engines and that is just wasted money on a street(track day every 3months) engine when you can spend the money on a plain bearing engine and make more power in a streetable package. Also the transmissions on the 900/1000s had transmission problems like 2nd gear, that the 650/750s did not.
I dont think you can really spin the plain valve engines any higher to make up for the smaller displacement. I think the engines will run into valve train characteristic speed limitations before piston speed.
The point they were getting at was not to cafe the 1000J I have in pieces, instead build the 650 with the 750 block I got from them and but an 810 kit in it. The bike will be much faster around the track than a 1000 on a dollar per dollar bases. Also it will be less likely to break.
i think Lorcan summed up how to get reliable hp from a 650/750 build when he said to buy a gpz750 turbo! :laugh:
Still recovering,some days are better than others.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Vorbeck
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
-
Registered
- fubar
- Posts: 64
- Thanks: 2
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:38
I have to go to school but will post full info after class.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mjg15
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 698
- Thanks: 18
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:40
All the conjecture is just because they are talking about street riding, that leaves open many variables, and even the slowest of bikes cant legally be ridden to its limits. Fear and common sense will also foster the creation all kinds of excuses.
Talk is fun, but in the end that's all it is.
The racetrack, whether it a dragstrip or road course, removes most of the BS from the equation.
Talk is fun, but in the end that's all it is.
The racetrack, whether it a dragstrip or road course, removes most of the BS from the equation.
'80 Z750fx
'81 KZ550A
'81 GPz550's, Too many!
'82 KZ1000R
'82 GPz750
'90 ZR550
Project photo album: s163.photobucket.com/albums/t289/mg15_ph...GPz-ZR550%20project/
s163.photobucket.com/albums/t289/mg15_ph...current=DSC01286.jpg
'81 KZ550A
'81 GPz550's, Too many!
'82 KZ1000R
'82 GPz750
'90 ZR550
Project photo album: s163.photobucket.com/albums/t289/mg15_ph...GPz-ZR550%20project/
s163.photobucket.com/albums/t289/mg15_ph...current=DSC01286.jpg
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- stonemaster
-
- User
-
Public
- Thanks: 0
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:49
dragstrip huh, is this comparison on the 1/8 mile or the 1/4 mile, the smaller might well be better on the 1/8 but in a 1/4, with competent riders, I'll bring some money

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PLUMMEN
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 7986
- Thanks: 104
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:58
and then theres that damn issue with stretched rod bolts on 900/1000s,oh wait thats another 650/750 issue!
ive got 2 1170 motors that were built before alot of the members on here were born,only thing done to the bottem ends is a welded crank with nothing special done to them.
theyve both got stock untouched transmisions in them,no main cap support to support the old roller cranks,no heavy duty case studs.
only thing special about them is 13:1 compression,heavily ported head and cams that are too big and 29mm carbs.
i could spend a day and have either of them running if you want to see what simple 1970s technology can do! :woohoo:
ive got 2 1170 motors that were built before alot of the members on here were born,only thing done to the bottem ends is a welded crank with nothing special done to them.
theyve both got stock untouched transmisions in them,no main cap support to support the old roller cranks,no heavy duty case studs.
only thing special about them is 13:1 compression,heavily ported head and cams that are too big and 29mm carbs.
i could spend a day and have either of them running if you want to see what simple 1970s technology can do! :woohoo:
Still recovering,some days are better than others.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frankn9
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 108
- Thanks: 0
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 13:59
so, these guys are telling you not to build the bike you have, instead keep buying stuff from them???
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PLUMMEN
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 7986
- Thanks: 104
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 14:09
and then theres those damn shim under buckets on 900/1000 motors,oh what a pain to adjust valves,oh wait 650 thing again! :laugh:
Still recovering,some days are better than others.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- T_Dub
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 1445
- Thanks: 25
Re: 900/1000 dogs compared to 650/750?
20 Jan 2011 14:13
Now now, shim under bucket is better performance wise buddy.
No reason to knock the 650/750 platform, its a solid design.
No reason to knock the 650/750 platform, its a solid design.
1977 KZ650B1
-810cc
-Cavanaugh Racing Head
-Mikuni RS34's
-GPR Muffler
-810cc
-Cavanaugh Racing Head
-Mikuni RS34's
-GPR Muffler
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Street Fighter LTD