Schorly wrote:
Look, here is one on ebay:
cgi.ebay.co.uk/Alfa-Romeo-Alfetta-33-75-...?hash=item1e59051ae8
It looks the same and is for older cars.
Yes, that definitely looks exactly like the HEI module. I did not know that Alpha used those. Very interesting. If it's cheap enough, then I'd say give it try.
Schorly wrote:
I just hope that the replacement igniter is not faulty as it is always a risk buying from ebay.
Very good point. Even if it does work, it's already close to 30 years old or more. One rain storm and who knows where you'll be when it breaks.
Schorly wrote:
What is the difference between the Kawasaki ignitor and the GM HEi module?
Besides being $500, new?
Actually there are a few diferences.
Schorly wrote:
Are the basics not the same by switching off the ignition coil, hence collapsing the magnetic field?
That part is basically the same. It's a big, Darlington, bi-polar-junction transistor that does the switching. That's only the output section of the modules.
The KZ system uses variable dwell in a very elegant, simple way. It uses the shape of the timing rotor's iron slug to determine the dwell characteristics. The faster the rotor spins, the larger the pickup signal, and the result is a larger dwell at higher RPMs. That makes the system very efficient. At idle, any ignition will have plenty of dwell to charge the coil. At higher RPMs, it needs more dwell angle, to get the same dwell time to charge the coil. By reducing the dwell at lower RPMs, it reduces the wasted electrical power wasted at lower RPMs. This works well to reduce battery drain at idle.
Points or Dyna S ignitions use a constant dwell-angle. The points compromise high RPM dwell in order to have a reasonable dwell at idle. The Dyna S uses a huge, constant dwell-angle to promote better high-rpm running, but the downside is that it wastes huge amounts of power at idle. This makes the charging system struggle at idle.
The GM HEI system uses electronics instead of the KZ's rotor-shape to determine the variable dwell characteristics. Because the two systems would interfere with each other, we simply ignore the HEI's electronic dwell control and use the KZ's inherent, natural dwell control. That's why we leave the one pin unplugged on the HEI module.
The HEI has a few other advantages. Because it has a current-limiter built in, it can use a wider range of ignition coils. In fact I've designed a few systems using Chrysler coil packs, GM coil packs, and even some super tiny coils from Dyna. They all worked well, but the coil packs were way too big to fit in the bike so I couldn't use them... shame too, because they were only like $10 on ebay. I plan on using the tiny Dyna coils, but that was a luck purchase on ebay. Those coils retail for a lot more than standard coils.
Here are more details you can download and open in notepad:
KZ ignition notes.txt
GM HEI notes.txt
And here's more notes about the reluctor signal on the KZ.